As reported by CNN:
As always, I am surprised only that people are surprised.
NFTs,
for the uninitiated, are non-fungible tokens, essentially digital
certificates of authenticity for digital content. Because they're
encoded on the blockchain, they can't easily be duplicated or
counterfeited, and each is unique, which is appealing to people cursed
with a compulsive collecting habit.
They
aren't, however, the actual pieces of content that they're linked to;
the blockchain is already enormous, and adding the entire piece of a
digital work to the chain would be prohibitively expensive. The digital
works in question are stored separately, and can be moved, altered, or
deleted without altering the NFTs themselves, resulting in a digital
certificate of authenticity for something which doesn't exist anymore.
So
NFTs aren't actually certificates of ownership in any convention sense.
Additionally, the licenses that they encode are almost always
specifically worded to exclude any sort of copyright, so someone
spending millions of dollars on an NFT can't even sell copies of the
thing they've "paid for." In essence, NFTs are an elaborate mechanism
for adding bragging rights to what is, effectively, Patreon.
What could possibly go wrong? Apart from the environmental impact of bitcoin mining, of course, which is enormous.
A
secondary effect of NFTs' collapsing value might also mean a collapse in the
price of Ethereum. Most NFTs are encoded on the Ethereum blockchain,
specifically, so a bursting NFT bubble might just burst the Ethereum
bubble, too. That would make PC gamers happy, since a burst in the
Ethereum mining bubble could mean a quick sell-of of the equipment used
to mine that particular cryptocurrency, including tens of thousands of
the latest PC graphics cards, which ease both the current supply shortage of those parts, and drive their prices down to something approaching MSRP.
Still... I have to shake my head at the whole thing. What were people thinking?