Jesus. Was it really three years ago that I first posted about Game Pass?
There are users for whom Game Pass is a good fit; heavy users who really will save money using the service, wealthy gamers for whom the cost of the service is essentially irrelevant, and ruthlessly opportunistic gamers who will pay for a single month only, and only when they "need" it, to play exactly one newly-released game and then cancel [...]
Game Pass is not a good deal; its value proposition is not, and never has been, "insane;" it is not a value option at all, really, except for people who semi-professionally play a wide variety of games, or people who may well have burgeoning video game addictions. So, be honest with yourself.
Do you have a problem? Are video games taking over your life, in ways that are possibly self-destructive and unhealthy? If so, then you don't need Game Pass; you need help, and there's no shame in asking for that help.
For a long time, I thought I was alone, screaming my frustration into the void. Because the deal really was bad, but nobody else seemed to be willing to call it out for the anti-consumer nonsense it was. Even as every multimedia conglomerate on Earth launched their own subscriber-driven Contentᵀᴹ service, only to watch them all beat hasty retreats after those services lost boatloads of money, Game Pass was made of Teflonᵀᴹ. Nothing ever stuck; the narrative never evolved.
That is, until today. From Ethan Gach at Kotaku:
It’s Time To Start Killing Your Subscriptions
The prices are going up and you probably barely use them anyway
I feel so seen right now.
The point of Gach's article emerges pretty quickly.
I have always maintained that Game Pass was a terrible value for almost everybody currently subscribed to it. The only thing that's changed is that some of the people who had been shamelessly shilling for Game Pass, up until now anyway, seem to finally be having a "come to Jesus" moment about it all.
It's about damn time.